What if it turns out that reducing emissions actually causes fewer clouds, which then may lead to a warmer atmosphere? Stated differently, what if the cure for global warming is the crisis? A group of nearly 200 scientists with the CO2 Coalition point out that carbon dioxide isn’t a pollutant and the hype over global warming is simply not settled.
Dr. Robert Malone, an internationally recognized scientist and physician who was the original inventor of mRNA and DNA vaccines who has concerns about the development and implementation of the technology he helped create, claims the science on global warming “isn’t so settled after all.”
He offers two studies that suggest a potential explanation that has nothing to do with CO2.
He says there are fewer clouds and the “decline in cloud cover, researchers say, could signal the start of a feedback loop that leads to more warming. The two scientific papers document that reduced aerosol particulates in the sky appear to be causing a decrease in low-cloud cover.
This is because water surrounds such particulates and causes cloud formation. So, the decreasing cloud cover, particularly in warmer regions, is causing temperatures worldwide to increase.
In fact, Dr. William Happer and W. A. van Wijngaarden, both with the CO2 Coalition, have determined that the warming effect of each molecule of CO2 decreases significantly as its concentration increases. This is why there was no runaway greenhouse warming when the concentration of CO2 was approaching 20 times that of today.
“This inconvenient fact, important though it is, is kept very well hidden and is rarely mentioned, for it undermines the theory of future catastrophic climate change,” according to the two scientists.
Dr. Happer, a renowned physicist and professor emeritus at Princeton University, plainly says the “climate scare is based on lies” and “[T]here is really no threat from increasing CO2 or any of the other minor greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. It’s all a made-up scare story.” You can watch an interview with Dr. Happer here.
Vijay Jayaraj, a Science and Research Associate with the CO2 Coalition agrees. He states: the whole greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) debate started with the “Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Massachusetts v. EPA, which ruled that EPA had the authority to regulate GHGs under the Clean Air Act if they endangered the public.” You can read his article here.
Under both Presidents Obama and Biden, the EPA concluded there was such a threat and CO2 was declared to be a harmful pollutants. This one decision and the following declaration by EPA “has been the cornerstone of wrongheaded climate regulation, an impediment to economic growth and destroyer of livelihoods.” Jayaraj goes on to say rulemaking by the EPA puts “ideology ahead of science”.
These regulations have contributed to the closing of more than 40 percent of the nation’s coal-fired power plants – one of the most economical and reliable generators of electricity and this is one of the major reasons there is a decrease in cloud cover.
Under Biden, the EPA doubled down, according to Dr. Jayaraj. “They imposed even stricter rules for power plants and automobiles, with the goal of achieving “net-zero emissions” by 2050,” which according to scientists is an unachievable goal.
He claims “of all the rule’s absurdities none is greater than the claim that CO2 is a pollutant catastrophically overheating the planet. More than a century of accepted science has established that the warming potential of CO2 decreases as its atmospheric concentration rises. This phenomenon of diminishing returns means that even doubling the amount of CO2 from the current levels would have only a modest effect on temperature.”
He claims: “the EPA also fails to account for the benefits of CO2. Higher levels of the gas increase plant growth and agricultural productivity through CO2’s fertilization effect – a factor in the greening of Earth over the last several decades, as affirmed by NASA,” significantly improving global food security.
Fortunately, President Trump gave the new EPA Secretary Lee Zeldin 30 days to make recommendations regarding “the legality and continuing applicability of the (GHG) rule.”
The tide is changing on GHG emissions and under President Trump’s leadership, perhaps the “global warming, climate change” hoax will come to an end.
Plants love CO2 for a reason (See this photo showing the effects of GHG).
*The CO2 Coalition was established in 2015 as a non-partisan educational foundation for the purpose of educating thought leaders, policy makers, and the public about the important contribution made by carbon dioxide to our lives and the economy. The Coalition seeks to engage in an informed and dispassionate discussion of climate change, humans’ role in the climate system, the limitations of climate models, and the consequences of mandated reductions in CO2 emissions.
